<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New automotive fuel-efficiency standards set for US, Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eartheasy.com/blog/2010/04/new-automotive-fuel-efficiency-standards-set-for-us-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2010/04/new-automotive-fuel-efficiency-standards-set-for-us-canada/</link>
	<description>Articles on topics about sustainable living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2010/04/new-automotive-fuel-efficiency-standards-set-for-us-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=1716#comment-2782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this site is best for sharing our ideas and find new things!!!!!!  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this site is best for sharing our ideas and find new things!!!!!!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2010/04/new-automotive-fuel-efficiency-standards-set-for-us-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=1716#comment-2346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad to see that this got off of the ground.  I don&#039;t know how I feel about the cap &amp; trade bill (I think we should have tried for something less expensive and more practical), but I don&#039;t honestly see how anyone who wants to preserve the future of our nation can oppose improved fuel economy at such a relatively low cost.  Today gas prices are probably high enough to make up the cash difference in five years.  By 2016, this will probably be like having money taken off of the price of the car. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad to see that this got off of the ground.  I don&#39;t know how I feel about the cap &amp; trade bill (I think we should have tried for something less expensive and more practical), but I don&#39;t honestly see how anyone who wants to preserve the future of our nation can oppose improved fuel economy at such a relatively low cost.  Today gas prices are probably high enough to make up the cash difference in five years.  By 2016, this will probably be like having money taken off of the price of the car. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->