<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geoengineering &#8211; will schemes to reverse global warming do more harm than good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/</link>
	<description>Articles on topics about sustainable living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: purcell</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>purcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engineers are also itching to build artificial trees with the aim of soaking up CO2.  But won&#039;t the CO2 burned in their construction wipe out any gains?  I discuss this and the place of &#039;agroforestry&#039; in our sustainable future in my weblog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://solarukweblog.wordpress.com/,&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://solarukweblog.wordpress.com/,&lt;/a&gt; under the posting &#039;Chicken Feed&#039;.  SolarUK is at the forefront of advanced but increasingly cost-effective (as gas and electricity prices shoot upwards) renewable technologies, producing solar hot water systems which will work effectively in cooler climates. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers are also itching to build artificial trees with the aim of soaking up CO2.  But won&#039;t the CO2 burned in their construction wipe out any gains?  I discuss this and the place of &#039;agroforestry&#039; in our sustainable future in my weblog, <a href="http://solarukweblog.wordpress.com/," target="_blank"></a><a href="http://solarukweblog.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://solarukweblog.wordpress.com/</a>, under the posting &#039;Chicken Feed&#039;.  SolarUK is at the forefront of advanced but increasingly cost-effective (as gas and electricity prices shoot upwards) renewable technologies, producing solar hot water systems which will work effectively in cooler climates. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harikamp3indir</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Harikamp3indir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These measures will have to be looked at individually, we can&#039;t just write them all off as useless. Too many pepole today are still in denial about climate change and we won&#039;t have time to change our lifestyles enough to make any difference in the climate. I fear that our only hope will be some sort of scientific intervention. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These measures will have to be looked at individually, we can&#039;t just write them all off as useless. Too many pepole today are still in denial about climate change and we won&#039;t have time to change our lifestyles enough to make any difference in the climate. I fear that our only hope will be some sort of scientific intervention. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one method will fix the problem that took centuries to create.  In order to achieve the dream of sustainable development it&#039;s going to take a whole picture approach of looking for renewable energy, reducing CO2 emissions, recycling, and reforestation.  The current practice of regulation on a country by country basis makes it extremely difficult for a coordinated effort.  The UN efforts help, but greater participation is required. 
 
Dean Calhoun 
Affygility Solutions 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://affygility.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://affygility.com&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one method will fix the problem that took centuries to create.  In order to achieve the dream of sustainable development it&#039;s going to take a whole picture approach of looking for renewable energy, reducing CO2 emissions, recycling, and reforestation.  The current practice of regulation on a country by country basis makes it extremely difficult for a coordinated effort.  The UN efforts help, but greater participation is required. </p>
<p>Dean Calhoun<br />
Affygility Solutions<br />
<a href="http://affygility.com" target="_blank">http://affygility.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlarneyBob</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>BlarneyBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iron fertilization of the oceans are a form of CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method of geoengineering, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change. Fertilization has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective method. &quot;Recent marine trials suggest that one kilogram of fine iron particles may generate well over 100,000 kilograms of plankton biomass. . . The maximum possible result from this technique, assuming the most favourable conditions and disregarding all practical considerations,is 0.29W/m2 of globally-averaged negative forcing[5], which is almost sufficient to reverse the warming effect of about 1/6th of current levels of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The technique has been tried and found to be effective more than every other technique mentioned except land use and forestation. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron fertilization of the oceans are a form of CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method of geoengineering, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change. Fertilization has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective method. &quot;Recent marine trials suggest that one kilogram of fine iron particles may generate well over 100,000 kilograms of plankton biomass. . . The maximum possible result from this technique, assuming the most favourable conditions and disregarding all practical considerations,is 0.29W/m2 of globally-averaged negative forcing[5], which is almost sufficient to reverse the warming effect of about 1/6th of current levels of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.&quot; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization</a> </p>
<p>The technique has been tried and found to be effective more than every other technique mentioned except land use and forestation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimist5</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimist5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main problem is overpopulation. If it&#039;s not going to get fixed - nothing will work and things will only get worse. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem is overpopulation. If it&#039;s not going to get fixed &#8211; nothing will work and things will only get worse. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://eartheasy.com/blog/2009/09/geoengineering-will-schemes-to-reverse-global-warming-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eartheasy.com/blog/?p=990#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These measures will have to be looked at individually, we can&#039;t just write them all off as useless. Too many pepole today are still in denial about climate change and we won&#039;t have time to change our lifestyles enough to make any difference in the climate. I fear that our only hope will be some sort of scientific intervention.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These measures will have to be looked at individually, we can&#039;t just write them all off as useless. Too many pepole today are still in denial about climate change and we won&#039;t have time to change our lifestyles enough to make any difference in the climate. I fear that our only hope will be some sort of scientific intervention.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->